"Higher Ground": Obama's Bubble is a Rising Ballon! An Open Answer to Joel
Posted: Wednesday, October 15, 2008
by Walter Rhett
Charleston Perlo
Joel, I believe you to be honest and devoted to fairness, but your recent article, "Obama's Bubble is About to Burst!" is simply guilt by association and doesn't amount to much! Regarding William Ayers: Ayers was and is a child of privilege--his father was President of Chicago's Commonwealth Edison, the power utility. Dad was a huge and important Chicago business leader and power in Chicago--his son was a spoiled brat radical who was readily reaccepted into Chicago's inner circle "after" his radical days. The Anneberg funded initiative is an example of that ready acceptance! The Annebergs are not radicals or left by any means--they founded, published, and owned Reader's Digest! Nor did Ayers ram himself as the head/chair. In Chicago, the privilege was his by dint of birth and family! That is also why the initiative had rising stars like Barack--Ayers in Chicago is viewed (rightly or wrongly) not by his radical years, but by his family's positions and connections--he is seen as his father's son--one of the most powerful and important business and civil leaders in a town of rich and powerful. In Chicago, if little "Bill" wanted you on his board, you would definitely serve. Ayers, a PhD., by the way, is prominent not because of his radical beliefs or actions, but because of his family and country club associations. Today, the Wall Street Journal, a conservative business paper, published an op-ed article that pointed out Ayers' activities of 40 years ago represent no threat to our freedoms. In fact, the only thing Ayers has plotted for the last 40 years in school reform! (That doesn't excuse Ayers' actions. But I'm sure you know a Baptist deacon in Gadsden who tore up cars, bars, and the bones of a few other people in his wild and impaccable youth. Just to say there really is a difference between then and now.
Would you be equally suspicious if the Democratic Rockefeller spoke to the Republican Rockefeller, or if the Kennedys for Hilary spoke to the Kennedys for Barack? There's nothing clandestine about the contact, nothing out of the ordinary.
Here's another African case of an official US State Department meeting with the opposition to an "elected" national government, just this year: "On January 14, 2008, the US Administration sent a clear signal of solidarity with the Eritrean democratic leaders by hosting a meeting at the State Department for one of the leading members of the EDA coalition.
"Dr. Jandayi Frazer, US Assistant Secretary in Charge of African Affairs on Monday held a lengthy meeting with Mr. Mesfin Hagos, EDA senior member and former Eritrean Defense Minister. Items discussed included the deteriorating economic and social crisis sweeping over that African country. Also discussed were the governments relentless disregard for the rule of law and its gross violations of human rights and civil liberties."
"The Eritrean delegation also held talks with Mr. Jeff Krilla, Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Bureau of Democracy and Human Rights and the Office of International Religious Freedom. EDA's main objective is to stamp out the despotic and arbitrary government in Eritrea and to put a just and forward-looking system in its place."
African politics is complicated, corrupt, and a battle royal to gain power, but any simple review or quick fact checking would show that the "Kenyan" president is a despicable fellow. In fact, during the Kenyan election campaign, the joke in Kenya was America would elect a member of Barack's family's ethnic Kenya community-before Kenya would!
And Joel, please, get over, this Muslim thing. No evidence, no record. I am a Southerner, an Christian and I know Muslims. Lots of them. In fact, one of the local Imans, Muslim religious leaders, has asked me to write for his newspaper. I love bean pie, only available at Muslim restaurants, where Ms. Wali also fixes a mean fish supreme sandwich. I used to give a Muslim co-worker rides to work. But I am a Christian! In fact, this morning I posted an article on prayer, here on Searchwarp. In fact, nobody in Charleston--not even the Muslims who I greet with respect using their traditional Islam greeting in Arabic, as-Salmu `Alaikum --would think I am a Muslim! In the 60's, eating at an African-American restaurant in Alabama, or having black friends (which most Southerners did), often brought on the same sort of smears and accusations. The black community is simply more religious diverse, in part due, the rejection and treatment, of white Christians who lost sight of the Golden rule.
It's a bigger world, now, Joel, and new rules apply. Friendships and new relationships have new definitions, encompass new ideas, and include more people. Because of the new direction, the path to higher ground (which by Biblical tradition also includes the lowly, the downtrodden, and the unrepentant sinner) will guide the re-building of the American economy and its standing in the world.
For the very reasons you cite he will lose, Barack will win. In three weeks, we will see. Sincerely, Walter.
This Article has been viewed 239 times. (Not updated in real-time.)
Top-level comments on this article: (2 total)Walter,I must admit, your response to Joel is much more eloquent and reasoned that mine might have been. Thank you for clarifying information that is out there for everybody to evaluate. Take care.
Walter, you have written a very nice article and I commend you for your reasonable approach. I differ with you on much of it but you have either misunderstood or misrepresented several of my points. I did not mean that Ayers ram-rodded himself in as leader of the CAC. He put Obama in as chairman of the board over those much higher qualified. And all I was showing here was that he was not "just a fellow who lives in the neighborhood" as Obama had tried to pass it off. And I know about Kenya also. I know that their present President is known world wide for his corruption and I did not try to side with him. What I was pointing out was that some 1500 innocent people died and much property lost, thousands displaced, because of Odinga's followers actions and he could have stopped it. He did stop it later. Neither did I reject him because of his being a Muslim but rather that he is an advocate of Sharia Law. No country needs that. I also know all of Ayers background, but that does not place him in a position to be an asset for a presidential candidate. You and Obama both know that, otherwise he would be standing by him rather than trying to act as if he hardly knows him. Enough, I grant you the right to see things as you wish, but it does not change my views.
We want your comments! If you can read this, you don't have javascript enabled, so you can't use this comment system. Please enable javascript.

